Global Warming & Climate Change
– A World Deceived
Paul Joseph Goebbels was Hilter’s propaganda minister in Nazi Germany who was virulently anti-Semitic and admired for his oratory skills. One of his famous quotes was “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it”. He also said that “The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Let’s think about how this has played out in most countries around the world over the past 20 years. The ‘Lie’ is based on invalidated assumptions propagated by a small number of scientists that conduct laboratory experiments that do not and cannot replicate how the hundreds of variables that contribute to the earth’s long-term temperature changes (up or down) generate Global Warming or Climate Change. The ‘State’ refers to governments, media and selected scientists that continue to assert a sense of urgency to prevent major consequences if action is not taken immediately.
What’s commonly asserted is that Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and ‘scientific opinion’ (represented by less than a hundred scientists) that the more carbon dioxide in the air, the higher the contribution to global warming whilst the extra warmth causes more water to evaporate from the oceans. That said, what is not yet known is whether the water remains as moist air in the atmosphere, or if it forms into more clouds and rain. When the carbon dioxide movement started, no one knew for sure, but the alarmists insisted that it would increase the amount of moist air around the planet, which would in turn warm the planet even further, citing that moist air was also a greenhouse gas.
This is the core idea of every official climate model, that for every part of warming due to carbon dioxide, they claim it ends up causing three parts of warming due to the extra moist air. The climate models amplify the carbon dioxide warming by a factor of three, so two-thirds of their projected warming is due to extra moist air (plus other factors) and that only one-third is due to extra carbon dioxide. Climate science is based on, an invalidated Theory because there are varying anomalies based on guesses that cannot be repeated by experiments in a laboratory. The alarmist’s case is based on a guess about moisture in the atmosphere but there is no evidence to support this assumption – This is a Lie.
That said, the main-stream media tends to only accept the invalidated assumptions of climate alarmists that predict End of World, Calamitous Scenarios if action is not taken immediately to mitigate this threat. Minimal investigation by the media, governments or scientists has been conducted to offer any alternative views to challenge these assumptions.
In fact, any deviation from the scientific consensus is quickly shutdown by the media, either choosing not to present the conflicting views and/or the alarmists that attack and denigrate these ideas as ‘conspiracy theories’.
This practise is becoming more common the world over as governments and the media work together to promote and reinforce the same message and it’s pointing to what is yet to come, A New World Order, One World Government, One World Currency, One World Digital Identity and One World Religion – In effect, Global Warming & Climate Change is just another mechanism for controlling the world and its citizens to conform to Global Authority. The World Economic Forum, due to host the world’s leaders in Singapore, this May 2021 has already articulated plans that they and the Socialist Left Governments of the World are preparing to implement in the next few years under the guise of an Impending Global Catastrophe. Some believe that this is likely to be a global pandemic similar to Covid-19.
Over the past 541 million years (Phanerozoic Eon), Earth’s climate has been relatively stable compared to preceding Eons. However, there have been periods of longer glaciations, which have been attributed to changes in the balance between Carbon Dioxide (CO2) sources and sinks. The major CO2 sources are thought to be Mantle CO2 Degassing, CO2 from Hotspot Volcanoes, Mid-Ocean Ridges & Rifts; Subduction Zone Volcanoes; Metamorphosis of Carbonate Rocks into Silicate Rocks; Oxidative Weathering and Oceanic & Continental Arc CO2 Degassing. The main CO2 sink is chemical weathering and the subsequent transfer of carbon to the ocean, where carbonate sediments lock up CO2 for long periods of time. In addition, Natural processes can also contribute to climate change, including internal variability such as Cyclical Ocean Patterns like El Niño, La Niña, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, changes in the Sun’s Energy Output and Variations in the Earth’s Orbit.
Since the 1960’s, thousands of Weather Balloons have been measuring the atmosphere every year. The climate models all predict that as the planet warms, a hot spot of moist air will develop over the tropics about 10 kilometres up and as the layer of moist air expands upwards into the cool dry air above. During the warming of the late 1970s, ’80s and ’90s, the weather balloons found No Hot Spot, None at All, Not Even A Small One. This evidence gathered over a period of more than 30 years supports the claim that the climate models are fundamentally flawed and that they significantly overestimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide.
In science, empirical evidence always outweighs theory, no matter how believable a theory is. In instances where the theory conflicts with available evidence, scientific method, based on the results of statistical analysis and the strength of scientific controls will dictate that the theory be dis-proven and cancelled. However, in stark conflict of this, climate scientists have ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence and a myriad of discrepancies in temperature analysis to instead cling to their carbon dioxide theory. This indicates the presence of an ulterior motive that continues to deceive millions of people the world over.
There are now several independent pieces of evidence showing that the earth responds to the warming due to extra carbon dioxide by dampening the warming. Every long-lived natural system behaves this way, counteracting any disturbance, otherwise the system would be unstable, and the climate system is no exception. In addition, on December 10, 2009, Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D., showed the potential effects of sunspot activity on climate, detailing solar geomagnetic to earth climate connections. On the subject of solar activity affecting climate variations, the geomagnetic modulation of cloudiness has about 10 times the effect on the amount of sunlight absorbed by the Earth as does the solar cycle’s direct modulation of the sun’s output. It also rivals the level of forcing due to anthropogenic (generated by humans) greenhouse gas emissions, but with way more variability from year to year and decade to decade.
However, the alarmists continue to say the exact opposite, that the climate system amplifies any warming due to extra carbon dioxide and that it is potentially unstable. It is no surprise that their predictions of earth’s temperature made in 1988 to the U.S. Congress, and again in 1990, 1995, and 2001, have all shown to be much higher than reality. They were exaggerated because their modelling projections were flawed and because there remains an ulterior motive.
Consensus scientists keep lowering the temperature increases they initially predicted from 0.30C per decade in 1990, to 0.20C per decade in 2001, yet they continue to propagate lies that “it’s worse than expected.” These scientists continue to overestimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide, selectively deny evidence, conceal the truth, & manipulate the data they collect to suit their objectives.
The official thermometers they use are often located in close proximity to indirect heat sources because Global Warming is measured in 10ths of a degree, so any extra heating nudge is important. Particularly concerning, was the location of weather stations next to Hot Springs, Power Plants, proximity to buildings, alongside air-conditioning units, near airport tarmacs, roads and parking lots. These types of locations are referred to as ‘Heat Sinks’. Data collected from thousands of these weather stations have distorted the accuracy of temperature rises by overstating the readings because minimum night-time temperatures increased more than daytime temperatures. The temperature readings from these weather stations combined with suitably located ones is being adjusted – This is a Major Deception.
On November 19, 2009, a collection of email messages, data files and data processing programs were leaked from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU) located in the UK, revealing scientific fraud and data manipulation by scientists concerning the Global Warming Theory. The scandal known as ‘Climategate’ brought to light the state of climate science over previous decades, revealed by more than a thousand emails, documents, and computer code sets between various prominent scientists. The released information highlighted evidence of deceit by climate scientists, which was kept a secret or hidden from the public until the data was leaked from the CRU. The CRU’s apparent obstruction of freedom-of-information requests, as revealed by the leaks, was only the tip of the iceberg. Climategate is said to have revealed the biggest scientific hoax in world history as the worst scandal of this generation.
The Climategate emails and climate data became the subject of intense debate, calling to question assumptions on anthropogenic (human-made) global warming. The legitimacy of climate science, and the charges levelled by the CRU and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which claim humans cause climate change, was severely disrupted by Climategate. Evidence revealed showed that the world had been deceived.
Despite the significance of the scandal and its impact on the theory suggesting humans cause climate change, the Mainstream media has repeatedly avoided the topic of investigating the Climategate story. The publication of a report by The Sunday Times of London, reported that scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit in the United Kingdom confessed to throwing out most of the raw temperature data on which the theory of global warming has been founded. One of the many problems that have since occurred as a result of the data loss has been that other academics have not been able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
The CRU scientists deliberately falsified data, and then used the results of the falsification to obtain additional research funding. This is criminal fraud under the rule of law. Climategate fraud also extended to the USA. The Climategate emails, originating from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, showed how all the data centres worldwide, including NOAA and NASA, conspired in the manipulation of global temperature records to suggest that temperatures in the 20th century rose faster than they actually did.
The number of actual weather stations used to calculate average global temperatures was reduced from about 6,000 in the 1970s to about 1,500 today. Average temperatures were extrapolated from readings in other cities across the world. This selectivity of locations made NASA’s data and climate change conclusions skewed to advance the global warming agenda rather than create data based on scientific facts. The Climategate emails showed that climatologists had conspired to suppress research that challenged the global warming orthodoxy.
‘Scientific fascism’ was the term coined by United States Congressman James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, in response to the Climategate scandal. The term referencing a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others, to prevent the acceptance of points of view contrary to those beliefs, to prevent the publication of papers by other scientists with whom they disagree and to delay or stymie the release of data to other scientists who could check their work in accordance with the steps of the scientific method.
Despite the significance of the scandal and its impact on climate science, the leftist media ignored it, and then focused on pushing forward with the global warming hoax. Coverage of Climategate showed just how biased the liberal media has become in order to advance an environmental agenda.
In the wake of the Climategate scandal, a bizarre situation happened whereby the mainstream media stories about global warming pretended the uncovered documents never happened. It was later revealed that the BBC had previously invested a lot of money in carbon offset programs, so the media organisation was dependent on the global warming hoax being perceived as truth. Fourteen days after the story broke worldwide, the Climategate scandal had been mentioned by the ABC, SBS, ABC, Channels 7, 9, 10 (Australia) CBS , NBC (Worldwide) Zero times. This is Deceit.
The Al Gore Effect
Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ movie, promoted Climate Science Fraud with all the pomp and ceremony of Hollywood that has propagated the global warming hoax. The film was designed to promote fear of global warming with false claims, junk science and digitally enhanced catastrophic events, proclaiming the end of the world. During Al Gore’s promotional efforts for his film and to raise alarm on the effects of global warming, he boldly predicted that we would only have 10 years left to save the planet from turning into a total frying pan.
The film conveyed a sense of urgency, and Gore spread alarmist propaganda claiming that burning fossil fuels such as coal, gas and oil have dramatically increased the Earth’s temperatures. Scientific inaccuracies in the film were enhanced with Hollywood special effects, as a deceptive tactic, to spread fear of doom on his one-sided account of the human caused global warming theory. In reality, the truth behind this hoax is ideology, motivated by money and power.
An expert witness, Mr Justice Barton, called in to give evidence when an attempt was made through the courts to prevent the film being shown in schools, stated that he identified 9 significant errors in the film, some of which he said, had arisen in “the context of alarmism and exaggeration” to support the former US Vice-President’s views on climate change. The “apocalyptic vision” presented in the film was not an impartial analysis of the science of climate change.
The mistakes identified mainly deal with the predicted impacts of climate change and include:
- Mr Gore’s claims that a sea-level rise of up to 20ft would be caused by melting in either west Antarctica or Greenland “in the near future”. The judge said: This is distinctly alarmist and that melting of the arctic ice could release this amount of water, but only after, and over, thousands of years.
- The film claimed that low-lying inhabited Pacific atolls “are being inundated because of anthropogenic global warming” – but there was no evidence of any evacuation occurring.
- It spoke of global warming “shutting down the ocean conveyor” – the process by which the gulf stream is carried over the north Atlantic to western Europe. The judge said that, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, it was “very unlikely” that the conveyor would shut down in the future, though it might slow down
- That two graphs, one plotting a rise in C02 and the other the rise in temperature over a period of 650,000 years, showed “an exact fit”. The judge said although scientists agreed there was a connection, “the two graphs do not establish what Mr Gore asserts”.
- Mr Gore said the disappearance of snow on Mt Kilimanjaro was expressly attributable to human-induced climate change. The judge said the consensus was that, that could not be established.
- The drying up of Lake Chad was used as an example of global warming. The judge said: “It is apparently considered to be more likely to result from … population increase, over-grazing and regional climate variability”
- Mr Gore also referred to a study showing that polar bears were being found that had drowned “swimming long distances to find the ice”. The judge said: “The only scientific study that either side before me can find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm”
- The film said that coral reefs all over the world were bleaching because of global warming and other factors. The judge said separating the impacts of stresses due to climate change from other stresses, such as over-fishing, and pollution, was difficult.
- That Al Gore crisscrossed countries waving his arms, passionately declaring, “We can’t wait… We have a planetary emergency… the future of human civilization is at stake! … Global warming is the greatest challenge we’ve ever faced!” This is no exaggeration.
It’s important to note that in the 14 years since the movie was released, none, not a single one of the impending catastrophes have eventuated or even come close to occurring. However, the damage has already been done to the integrity of the broader scientific community and to governments the world over, being forced to accommodate demands of their citizens to reduce emissions by subsidising renewable energy sources to the tune of trillions of dollars. Most of this money borrowed has indebted countries into perpetuity with loans they will never be able repay, further restricting their ability to provide support services to their citizens.
Al Gore is a Law Graduate who spent his professional career as a US senator, as a Vice President and then transitioned into the role of Environment Messiah for which he received a Nobel Prize in 2017. Despite not having any formal qualifications in science, Al Gore preached the alarmism of climate change and global warming, spreading exaggerated predictions using invalidated assumptions to warn world governments and citizens of catastrophic consequences that would befall the planet in the near future, none of which have eventuated, Deceiving The World.
Al Gore, now has wealth estimated at over $330 million (increased from $1.7 million in 1999), he commands $175,000 in speaking fees per event, is tied to at least 14 Green-Tech firms, sits strategically on certain boards, (Apple, Google) and benefits from millions of dollars in tax breaks for the industry he helped create.
Insatiable Greed - Global Elites
Facebook founder billionaire Mark Zuckerberg is currently building six solar projects, each the size of four football fields in the New Mexico desert supported by significant tax benefits introduced by the President (Barrack Hussein Obama) that he helped get re-elected in 2012 by manipulating social media content in his favour.
Billionaire former Google CEO Eric Schmitt endorsed Barack Hussein Obama for president in 2008. In 2013, he cashed in on his friendship with Obama to allocate a $1.6 billion stimulus loan toward the Ivanpah Solar Thermal Project along the California-Nevada border. Google was a joint owner of Ivanpah, and “only” destroyed 4,000 acres of pristine land for the process of littering the desert with hundreds of thousands of mirrors.
See how it works. Elites donate funds to political left-wing political parties, who then, in turn reward their donors with billions of dollars in benefits.
Manipulating Information Sources
Lawrence Solomon from the National Post discovered from the Climategate emails how a small band of climatologists plotted to rewrite history as well as science, particularly by eliminating the Medieval Warm Period. The Climategate emails revealed the enlistment of Wikipedia in their plan to rewrite history. It was revealed how Wikipedia’s ‘Green Doctor’, a U.K. scientist and Green Party activist, William Connolley, starting in February 2003, set to work on the Wikipedia site to re-write articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models and global cooling. He began to erase the Little Ice Age, the Medieval Warm Period, the hockey stick graph, articles on the politics of global warming and on the scientists, who were sceptical of the approach.
Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world’s most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets, followed by Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period. In total, Connolley wrote / re-wrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles through the role he obtained as the website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the arguments that other scientists were making, he removed them, just over 500 articles including over 2,000 contributors being blocked from writing further articles. William Connolley literally rewrote history and then abused his literary privileges to stifle criticism of the global warming orthodoxy. Lawrence Solomon wrote on this revelation and on Wikipedia’s loss of integrity as a source of factual information, and on the clear abuse of power from administrative authorities within Wikipedia.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emission is not the only plausible explanation for global warming. Water vapor, not CO2, is the most influential greenhouse gas. It is difficult to determine what effect, if any, mankind has on worldwide water vapor levels. Given the small percentage of human-produced CO2, as compared to other greenhouse gases, human impact on global temperature may be as little as 1%. Ice Age temperature studies, although rough, frequently show temperatures changing before CO2 levels, not after.
Computer simulations used to ‘predict’ global warming require the assumption of human causation, and even then are not typically repeatable or reliable. Current computer weather simulations are neither predictive nor repeatable. In the 1970s, global temperatures had in fact been dropping since 1945, and a ‘global cooling’ concern became prominent, despite what is now dismissed as a lack of scientific support. The consensus claimed by most global warming theorists is not scientific proof, rather, it is a statement of majority opinion. Scientific majorities have been wrongly influenced by politics and other factors in the past. This consensus, as with many other scientific theories, can be partially explained by growing hostility to those with differing viewpoints.
The data being used to support anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming is typically based on small data sets, single samples, or measurements taken in completely different regions. This creates an uncertainty in the results that rarely gets the attention that alarmist conclusions do. These are several of the major points that raise doubts about humankind’s actual effect on global temperatures. Overwhelming evidence of any objective type does not exist to support the idea that global warming is significantly influenced by human actions.
During the last 100 years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers. This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers’ theory: “New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth’s climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an ‘umbrella effect’,” (Journal Science Daily) – Significant findings – an entirely natural occurrence.
The scientists involved in the study are most concerned with the fact that current climate models driving the political side of debate, most notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) climate sensitivity scale, fail to incorporate this crucial and potentially central variable of increased cloud cover.
“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has discussed the impact of cloud cover on climate in their evaluations, but this phenomenon has never been considered in climate predictions due to the insufficient physical understanding of it,” comments Professor Hyodo in Science Daily. “This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect.” This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. The umbrella effect caused by galactic cosmic rays is important when thinking about current global warming as well as the warm period of the medieval era.
Climate change has morphed into an enormous beast idolised by millions of people, with a host of jobs, industries, profits, careers, and the coordinated momentum of the world’s governments to achieve defined targets on CO2 reduction. Even though the data used to build the case for climate change was flawed from the outset, successive governments and their conformist scientists, have maintained the fiction that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.
Christians ought to treat our world with respect and good stewardship, but we should not allow politically driven hysteria to dominate our view of the environment. Our relationship with God is not dependent on our belief in global warming. God appointed man to be the steward of this world (Genesis 1:28), not the destroyer of it. However, we should not allow environmentalism to become a form of idolatry, where the “rights” of an inanimate planet and its non-human creatures are held in higher esteem than God (Romans 1:25) and man created in His image.
Global Warming, as with any other topic, it is crucial to understand what the facts are, whom those facts come from, how they are interpreted, and what the spiritual implications are. We must seek to obey God’s directive to care for and develop the earth’s resources while using them wisely and unselfishly (Gen.1:28; Ps.8:4-8), especially to help the poor and underprivileged. We do not need to succumb to fear by doomsayers and scientists contradicting God’s promise to maintain stability in seasons and oceans (Gen. 8:22; Gen. 9:11; Jer. 5:22). People grieve God when they fail to acknowledge His ultimate control of changing, cyclical weather patterns. In (Jeremiah 5:23 – 25) God issues a strong rebuke for people not acknowledging His ultimate control over the weather. Some additional bible passages are included below:
1 John 2:15-17
Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride in possessions—is not from the Father but is from the world. And the world is passing away along with its desires, but whoever does the will of God abides forever.
Colossians 3:2 ESV
Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth.
James 4:4 ESV
You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore, whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God.
Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.
For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people, training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age,